Instead of killing Microsoft, open source could make the company stronger. Has The VAR Guy lost his mind with this thesis? Absolutely not. In fact, the software giant recently tried to join the Open Solutions Alliance, which includes roughly a dozen open source companies, The VAR Guy hears. What’s Microsoft up to? The potential answer involves Windows Longhorn.
Microsoft’s next major Windows Server release, code-named Longhorn, could make-or-break the company’s Web 2.0 strategy. The latest test release of Longhorn shipped on April 4, according to ZDNet’s Mary Jo Foley. Microsoft expects to ship the final product to business customers late this year.
Now, for some unconventional thinking: For Longhorn to truly succeed, The VAR Guy believes Microsoft will need open source application developers in its corner. Sound impossible? Guess again.
Sure, some members of the mainstream press and even some naive members of the IT trade press believe open source applications only run on Linux. How wrong they are. In reality, major open source developers — from MySQL to SugarCRM — have long supported Windows. In fact, about one-third of SugarCRM deployments run on Windows- rather than Linux-based systems, according to a spokeswoman for SugarCRM.
But that’s not good enough. Microsoft needs to move deeper into the open source community. And it needs to move fast. The day Longhorn is ready to ship, Microsoft needs to make sure MySQL, SugarCRM, Centric CRM and other open source application developers are ready to support the new operating system.
Apparently, Microsoft agrees with this thesis. A trusted source says Microsoft recently attempted to join the Open Solutions Alliance. The organization, which includes about a dozen open source companies, declined to admit Microsoft into the group because members worried about Microsoft’s motives.
History suggests Microsoft will continue reaching out to rival developers. Skeptical? Flash back to 1993. At the time, Microsoft’s Windows NT Advanced Server was a new product desperate for customers. To stir demand, Microsoft spent several years recruiting big developers — companies like CA Inc., SAP AG and even Oracle Corp. — to support NT.
Sure, Oracle and other third-party software providers competed fiercely with Microsoft’s own email and database groups. But competition in the application arena stirred demand for Windows NT, and ultimately made Microsoft a server powerhouse.
Now, Microsoft needs to create an equally rich market for Longhorn applications. If the company doesn’t embrace more open source application partners, rival operating systems like Red Hat Linux will continue to gain momentum.
Of course, Microsoft’s Windows empire was built upon third-party application support. Microsoft somehow forgot that critical rule when it recently shipped Windows Vista for desktops and notebooks. Can anybody name a single great application for Vista? Anyone?
Fact is, there are no killer applications for Vista. For the sake of Microsoft shareholders, customers and partners, let’s hope the software giant doesn’t make the same mistake with Longhorn.
Interact: Add a Comment | Trackback Link | Permalink
Share:
Subscribe: RSS Feed


_3.gif)

Good find (the OSA thing). They still try to establish a position from which they can act as a Trojan horse and mingle with the rivals. There’s nothing but malice there because they attempt to change perceptions. Watch the details in the following article and see what they do…
“Microsoft seems to have hijacked Linux Asia”
,—-[ Quote ]
| Was the general feel amongst the attendees at Linux Asia 2007;
| MS however, just wanted to say ”let us walk hand-in-hand”
`—-
http://www.ciol.com/content/developer/Linux/2007/107020104.asp
Roy: Good to have you in the TechIQ community. I noticed The VAR Guy replies a lot to your posts. But I did want to assure you that our editors are watching the site, too. Not sure how VAR Guy learned about the OSA news but we were able to confirm it with multiple sources.
-jp, TechIQ