<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cisco Finally Open to Open Source; Mulls Deeper Microsoft Relationship</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thevarguy.com/2007/09/12/cisco-finally-gets-open-source-mulls-deeper-microsoft-relationship/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thevarguy.com/2007/09/12/cisco-finally-gets-open-source-mulls-deeper-microsoft-relationship/</link>
	<description>Channel News, Reseller News and Channel Partner Programs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:00:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechIQ &#187; Archive &#187; Cisco: 8 Trends Worth Watching</title>
		<link>http://www.thevarguy.com/2007/09/12/cisco-finally-gets-open-source-mulls-deeper-microsoft-relationship/comment-page-1/#comment-59043</link>
		<dc:creator>TechIQ &#187; Archive &#187; Cisco: 8 Trends Worth Watching</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 03:12:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techiqmag.com/2007/09/12/cisco-finally-gets-open-source-mulls-deeper-microsoft-relationship/#comment-59043</guid>
		<description>[...] be clear here. Cisco doesn&#8217;t plan to open source its IOS operating system. But the company finally mentioned open source and software in the same sentence at this event. The message was clear: Cisco wants to be open to all software relationships, and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] be clear here. Cisco doesn&#8217;t plan to open source its IOS operating system. But the company finally mentioned open source and software in the same sentence at this event. The message was clear: Cisco wants to be open to all software relationships, and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechIQ &#187; Archive &#187; Cisco, Microsoft Resume Unified Communications Battle</title>
		<link>http://www.thevarguy.com/2007/09/12/cisco-finally-gets-open-source-mulls-deeper-microsoft-relationship/comment-page-1/#comment-33089</link>
		<dc:creator>TechIQ &#187; Archive &#187; Cisco, Microsoft Resume Unified Communications Battle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 16:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techiqmag.com/2007/09/12/cisco-finally-gets-open-source-mulls-deeper-microsoft-relationship/#comment-33089</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] can bet that the software giant and Cisco will find some sort of way to at least acknowledge that they are working to ensure interoperability across their [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] can bet that the software giant and Cisco will find some sort of way to at least acknowledge that they are working to ensure interoperability across their [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Earnhardt</title>
		<link>http://www.thevarguy.com/2007/09/12/cisco-finally-gets-open-source-mulls-deeper-microsoft-relationship/comment-page-1/#comment-26332</link>
		<dc:creator>John Earnhardt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 18:19:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techiqmag.com/2007/09/12/cisco-finally-gets-open-source-mulls-deeper-microsoft-relationship/#comment-26332</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I would draw your attention to Joe Burton&#039;s post on Cisco&#039;s blog about UC.  He is CTO of our UC group.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;He states in part, &quot;In this ever-changing global economy, can any business wait around to get outpaced by competitors while they experiment with PC or email-client-based-architecture for unified communications? Can they afford to exclude future prospective customers, employees, or partners who do not use email as their preferred communications medium? Can they afford the 18-24 month wait for a software-client-based call control architecture that will be marginally mature and deployable?&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Full post here: http://blogs.cisco.com/news/2007/09/analysis_paralysis_on_uc_strat.html&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would draw your attention to Joe Burton&#8217;s post on Cisco&#8217;s blog about UC.  He is CTO of our UC group.</p>
<p>He states in part, &#8220;In this ever-changing global economy, can any business wait around to get outpaced by competitors while they experiment with PC or email-client-based-architecture for unified communications? Can they afford to exclude future prospective customers, employees, or partners who do not use email as their preferred communications medium? Can they afford the 18-24 month wait for a software-client-based call control architecture that will be marginally mature and deployable?&#8221;</p>
<p>Full post here: <a href="http://blogs.cisco.com/news/2007/09/analysis_paralysis_on_uc_strat.html" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.cisco.com/news/2007/09/analysis_paralysis_on_uc_strat.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Content Delivery Network via Rackspace Cloud Files: c810354.r54.cf2.rackcdn.com

Served from: www.thevarguy.com @ 2012-02-10 10:51:17 -->
