The VAR Guy enjoys a lite beer from time to time. But Lite software? No thanks. Generally speaking, “Lite” versions of software have tanked over the years. Anybody else remember NetWare Lite?
In the 1990s, Novell attempted to push beyond its established NetWare brand by launching “NetWare Lite,” a peer-to-peer network operating system that bombed for multiple reasons. One key factor in the failure, The VAR Guy insists, was product branding.
After all, “Lite” suggests that a software product is inferior or weaker than a higher-end release. (The food and beverage industries have gotten around this because their lite products have a clear benefit — fewer calories.) Novell tried to salvage NetWare Lite as Personal NetWare, but the damage was already done.
Much like Novell a decade ago, Autotask faced a similar branding quandary this week as it prepared to launch a low-end managed services platform. Autotask made the right call by positioning “Autotask Go!” as an entry-level product (it costs only $99 per month) and “Autotask Pro” as the higher-end release. “Go” inspires action, and suggests safe passage for solutions providers that want to give managed services a try. Had the product been branded “Autotask Lite,” it would have immediately triggered questions about “what’s missing” from the product.
Autotask’s branding reminds The VAR Guy of the simple messaging coming out of OnForce these days. As you may know, OnForce offers an online market place for solutions providers. And the OnForce brand is a simple, green circle with the “on” button in it, suggesting that it’s safe to proceed into the market place.
As solutions providers launch services of their own, they would be wise to study and emulate the Autotask and OnForce branding moves.
Interact: Add a Comment | Trackback Link | Permalink
Share: digg | del.icio.us | Technorati | StumbleUpon
Subscribe: RSS Feed




[…] info By Guy Categories: Uncategorized You can’t success in other industriesExcellent reminder that a brand extension only works if there is percieved value. “Lite” […]