<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dell: No Plans for Ubuntu Linux Servers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thevarguy.com/2008/04/10/dell-no-plans-for-ubuntu-linux-servers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thevarguy.com/2008/04/10/dell-no-plans-for-ubuntu-linux-servers/</link>
	<description>What's Next In the IT Channel</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:14:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lettre Hebdomadaire Ubuntu n° 86 du 6 au 12 avril 2008. &#171; Lettre Hebdomadaire Ubuntu</title>
		<link>http://www.thevarguy.com/2008/04/10/dell-no-plans-for-ubuntu-linux-servers/comment-page-1/#comment-63068</link>
		<dc:creator>Lettre Hebdomadaire Ubuntu n° 86 du 6 au 12 avril 2008. &#171; Lettre Hebdomadaire Ubuntu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 21:58:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thevarguy.com/2008/04/10/dell-no-plans-for-ubuntu-linux-servers/#comment-63068</guid>
		<description>[...] Dell&#160;: pas de projet de serveurs Ubuntu - Dell va sans doute fournir des machines équipées d&#8217;Ubuntu 8.04 d&#8217;ici cet été, mais n&#8217;a pas l&#8217;intention de proposer pour le moment des serveurs sous Ubuntu. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Dell&nbsp;: pas de projet de serveurs Ubuntu &#8211; Dell va sans doute fournir des machines équipées d&#8217;Ubuntu 8.04 d&#8217;ici cet été, mais n&#8217;a pas l&#8217;intention de proposer pour le moment des serveurs sous Ubuntu. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ubuntu Look &#187; Ubuntu Weekly Newsletter #86</title>
		<link>http://www.thevarguy.com/2008/04/10/dell-no-plans-for-ubuntu-linux-servers/comment-page-1/#comment-62924</link>
		<dc:creator>Ubuntu Look &#187; Ubuntu Weekly Newsletter #86</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 16:17:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thevarguy.com/2008/04/10/dell-no-plans-for-ubuntu-linux-servers/#comment-62924</guid>
		<description>[...] * Dell: No Plans for Ubuntu Linux Servers - Canonical has plenty of momentum on the desktop, but as Canonical gears up for a server push, one key Ubuntu partner plans to sit on the sidelines. Dell has no plans to ship Ubuntu on its servers according to a Dell source. Dell does plan to support Ubuntu 8.04 (code-named Hardy Heron) on selected desktops this spring or summer. It&#8217;s hard to blame Dell for taking a &#8220;wait and see&#8221; approach on the Ubuntu server. After all, Red Hat and Novell are both firmly entrenched in the Linux server market. For Ubuntu to succeed on the server, it will need a critical mass of integrators, consultants and software developers willing to sell, service and support Ubuntu-centric systems. http://www.thevarguy.com/2008/04/10/dell-no-plans-for-ubuntu-linux-servers/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] * Dell: No Plans for Ubuntu Linux Servers &#8211; Canonical has plenty of momentum on the desktop, but as Canonical gears up for a server push, one key Ubuntu partner plans to sit on the sidelines. Dell has no plans to ship Ubuntu on its servers according to a Dell source. Dell does plan to support Ubuntu 8.04 (code-named Hardy Heron) on selected desktops this spring or summer. It&#8217;s hard to blame Dell for taking a &#8220;wait and see&#8221; approach on the Ubuntu server. After all, Red Hat and Novell are both firmly entrenched in the Linux server market. For Ubuntu to succeed on the server, it will need a critical mass of integrators, consultants and software developers willing to sell, service and support Ubuntu-centric systems. <a href="http://www.thevarguy.com/2008/04/10/dell-no-plans-for-ubuntu-linux-servers/" rel="nofollow">http://www.thevarguy.com/2008/04/10/dell-no-plans-for-ubuntu-linux-servers/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fsdaily.com</title>
		<link>http://www.thevarguy.com/2008/04/10/dell-no-plans-for-ubuntu-linux-servers/comment-page-1/#comment-62838</link>
		<dc:creator>fsdaily.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 09:51:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thevarguy.com/2008/04/10/dell-no-plans-for-ubuntu-linux-servers/#comment-62838</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Story added...&lt;/strong&gt;

This story has been submitted to fsdaily.com! If you think this story should be read by the free software community, come vote it up and discuss it here:

http://www.fsdaily.com/Business/Dell_No_Plans_for_Ubuntu_Linux_Servers...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Story added&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This story has been submitted to fsdaily.com! If you think this story should be read by the free software community, come vote it up and discuss it here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.fsdaily.com/Business/Dell_No_Plans_for_Ubuntu_Linux_Servers.." rel="nofollow">http://www.fsdaily.com/Business/Dell_No_Plans_for_Ubuntu_Linux_Servers..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.thevarguy.com/2008/04/10/dell-no-plans-for-ubuntu-linux-servers/comment-page-1/#comment-62834</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 05:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thevarguy.com/2008/04/10/dell-no-plans-for-ubuntu-linux-servers/#comment-62834</guid>
		<description>Using ubuntu on server would be insane. I would not take Dell seriously if they would ship Ubuntu on their servers. Ubuntu is buggy as hell. Who would use distro like that on server, or on business desktop? If someone hacks to the server he can make big damage and if your business depends on that server, then you don&#039;t want that to happen.

I really would like to hear from Canonical if they are ready to take responsibility if someone hacks to server using security hole which is in ubuntu because Ubuntu packages are development versios which are not tested well. Canonical knows that their distro is based on development version of Debian, and still they are marketing ubuntu as a reliable and tested server OS. They are not telling their customers that most of the ubuntu packages are recompiled directly from Debian unstable which is not even meant to be used by end users. Is Canonical going to pay the possible damages for those whose server is hacked? i think not, so it&#039;s server maintainers responsibility to choose distro which is well tested, and Ubuntu sure is not.

I have to say I would not use ubuntu on business desktop workstations either. Ubuntu is newbie home user&#039;s distro, not any professional business distro which can be trusted and which works reliably.

If you want reliability on server or on destop, and if you like Debian style system, then use Debian stable release, which is wery well tested. Current Debian stable release is now one year old and next version will most likely be released next september or before the end of the year 2008.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Using ubuntu on server would be insane. I would not take Dell seriously if they would ship Ubuntu on their servers. Ubuntu is buggy as hell. Who would use distro like that on server, or on business desktop? If someone hacks to the server he can make big damage and if your business depends on that server, then you don&#8217;t want that to happen.</p>
<p>I really would like to hear from Canonical if they are ready to take responsibility if someone hacks to server using security hole which is in ubuntu because Ubuntu packages are development versios which are not tested well. Canonical knows that their distro is based on development version of Debian, and still they are marketing ubuntu as a reliable and tested server OS. They are not telling their customers that most of the ubuntu packages are recompiled directly from Debian unstable which is not even meant to be used by end users. Is Canonical going to pay the possible damages for those whose server is hacked? i think not, so it&#8217;s server maintainers responsibility to choose distro which is well tested, and Ubuntu sure is not.</p>
<p>I have to say I would not use ubuntu on business desktop workstations either. Ubuntu is newbie home user&#8217;s distro, not any professional business distro which can be trusted and which works reliably.</p>
<p>If you want reliability on server or on destop, and if you like Debian style system, then use Debian stable release, which is wery well tested. Current Debian stable release is now one year old and next version will most likely be released next september or before the end of the year 2008.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fulko Hew</title>
		<link>http://www.thevarguy.com/2008/04/10/dell-no-plans-for-ubuntu-linux-servers/comment-page-1/#comment-62748</link>
		<dc:creator>Fulko Hew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 20:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thevarguy.com/2008/04/10/dell-no-plans-for-ubuntu-linux-servers/#comment-62748</guid>
		<description>Dell does???... DID... sell RedHat based servers (I bought some!).  I don&#039;t know if the still do.  If they do still sell those, they really wouldn&#039;t need to also sell Ubuntu based boxes too.   ...not really.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dell does???&#8230; DID&#8230; sell RedHat based servers (I bought some!).  I don&#8217;t know if the still do.  If they do still sell those, they really wouldn&#8217;t need to also sell Ubuntu based boxes too.   &#8230;not really.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Panettieri</title>
		<link>http://www.thevarguy.com/2008/04/10/dell-no-plans-for-ubuntu-linux-servers/comment-page-1/#comment-62746</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Panettieri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 18:49:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thevarguy.com/2008/04/10/dell-no-plans-for-ubuntu-linux-servers/#comment-62746</guid>
		<description>remi: I think it does matter whether Dell gives its blessing (or not) to Ubuntu on the server. It would be a huge vote of confidence to customers who would otherwise choose Windows Server, Red Hat or NOVL.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>remi: I think it does matter whether Dell gives its blessing (or not) to Ubuntu on the server. It would be a huge vote of confidence to customers who would otherwise choose Windows Server, Red Hat or NOVL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: remi</title>
		<link>http://www.thevarguy.com/2008/04/10/dell-no-plans-for-ubuntu-linux-servers/comment-page-1/#comment-62745</link>
		<dc:creator>remi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 18:36:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thevarguy.com/2008/04/10/dell-no-plans-for-ubuntu-linux-servers/#comment-62745</guid>
		<description>You can get OSes pre-installed on servers ... ?  I&#039;m running abunchof Ubuntu Server installations on Dell servers ... 

So long as Dell ships its servers with some kindof linux support (or they bear it in mind when choosing components), does this really matter?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can get OSes pre-installed on servers &#8230; ?  I&#8217;m running abunchof Ubuntu Server installations on Dell servers &#8230; </p>
<p>So long as Dell ships its servers with some kindof linux support (or they bear it in mind when choosing components), does this really matter?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ubuntu Look &#187; Dell: No Plans for Ubuntu Linux Servers</title>
		<link>http://www.thevarguy.com/2008/04/10/dell-no-plans-for-ubuntu-linux-servers/comment-page-1/#comment-62744</link>
		<dc:creator>Ubuntu Look &#187; Dell: No Plans for Ubuntu Linux Servers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 17:26:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thevarguy.com/2008/04/10/dell-no-plans-for-ubuntu-linux-servers/#comment-62744</guid>
		<description>[...] First, a little history lesson. Dell in mid-2007 began pre-loading Ubuntu on selected desktops and notebooks. (Yes, The VAR Guy now has one.)   Read more at  The VAR Guy. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] First, a little history lesson. Dell in mid-2007 began pre-loading Ubuntu on selected desktops and notebooks. (Yes, The VAR Guy now has one.)   Read more at  The VAR Guy. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sporkman</title>
		<link>http://www.thevarguy.com/2008/04/10/dell-no-plans-for-ubuntu-linux-servers/comment-page-1/#comment-62743</link>
		<dc:creator>Sporkman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 16:57:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thevarguy.com/2008/04/10/dell-no-plans-for-ubuntu-linux-servers/#comment-62743</guid>
		<description>Ubuntu server seems pretty stable &amp; solid to me - I run my low powered but busy server on it, with no problems...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ubuntu server seems pretty stable &amp; solid to me &#8211; I run my low powered but busy server on it, with no problems&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Panettieri</title>
		<link>http://www.thevarguy.com/2008/04/10/dell-no-plans-for-ubuntu-linux-servers/comment-page-1/#comment-62742</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Panettieri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 16:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thevarguy.com/2008/04/10/dell-no-plans-for-ubuntu-linux-servers/#comment-62742</guid>
		<description>Buzz (#6): I disagree. Dell introduced Ubuntu desktops the year Vista shipped. That was a GUTSY move. And Dell has aggressively promoted NOVL and RHT linux, despite the ongoing relationships with Intel and MSFT.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Buzz (#6): I disagree. Dell introduced Ubuntu desktops the year Vista shipped. That was a GUTSY move. And Dell has aggressively promoted NOVL and RHT linux, despite the ongoing relationships with Intel and MSFT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Panettieri</title>
		<link>http://www.thevarguy.com/2008/04/10/dell-no-plans-for-ubuntu-linux-servers/comment-page-1/#comment-62741</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Panettieri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 16:35:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thevarguy.com/2008/04/10/dell-no-plans-for-ubuntu-linux-servers/#comment-62741</guid>
		<description>Chris: Your facts don&#039;t seem like facts. 

Fact 1) Sun&#039;s CEO is transforming the company through open source. 

Fact 2) You are correct. Ubuntu server is unproven. But Canonical has been prepping a server software initiative. So it IS important to say who&#039;s onboard (Sun) and who isn&#039;t (Dell) so far.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris: Your facts don&#8217;t seem like facts. </p>
<p>Fact 1) Sun&#8217;s CEO is transforming the company through open source. </p>
<p>Fact 2) You are correct. Ubuntu server is unproven. But Canonical has been prepping a server software initiative. So it IS important to say who&#8217;s onboard (Sun) and who isn&#8217;t (Dell) so far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Cox</title>
		<link>http://www.thevarguy.com/2008/04/10/dell-no-plans-for-ubuntu-linux-servers/comment-page-1/#comment-62739</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Cox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 16:15:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thevarguy.com/2008/04/10/dell-no-plans-for-ubuntu-linux-servers/#comment-62739</guid>
		<description>Fact 1: Sun will eat you alive and has NO interest in supporting Linux.

Fact 2: Ubuntu Server is UNPROVEN.  It&#039;s difficult enough to get companies to commit to Red Hat or Novell.  Companies ARE NOT looking at Ubuntu, the only reason Sun looks at them is for their OWN agenda (which will be Solaris and NOT Ubuntu).

So... wither Ubuntu Server?  No.  Of course not.  This post was just VERY premature.  Eventually I think we will see Ubuntu Servers and most likely, Dell will be one of the players in that.  That is... IF and only IF, Ubuntu on the Server proves to be viable (depends on Canonical&#039;s ability to deliver corporate, very intimate and personal, support to customers).

Blogs == The National Inquirer of the internet

Next entry: Lack of Linux is Killing Planet Earth</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fact 1: Sun will eat you alive and has NO interest in supporting Linux.</p>
<p>Fact 2: Ubuntu Server is UNPROVEN.  It&#8217;s difficult enough to get companies to commit to Red Hat or Novell.  Companies ARE NOT looking at Ubuntu, the only reason Sun looks at them is for their OWN agenda (which will be Solaris and NOT Ubuntu).</p>
<p>So&#8230; wither Ubuntu Server?  No.  Of course not.  This post was just VERY premature.  Eventually I think we will see Ubuntu Servers and most likely, Dell will be one of the players in that.  That is&#8230; IF and only IF, Ubuntu on the Server proves to be viable (depends on Canonical&#8217;s ability to deliver corporate, very intimate and personal, support to customers).</p>
<p>Blogs == The National Inquirer of the internet</p>
<p>Next entry: Lack of Linux is Killing Planet Earth</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
