<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ubuntu Live 2008 Conference: Canceled</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thevarguy.com/2008/05/20/ubuntu-live-2008-conference-canceled/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thevarguy.com/2008/05/20/ubuntu-live-2008-conference-canceled/</link>
	<description>Channel News, Reseller News and Channel Partner Programs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:59:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Panettieri</title>
		<link>http://www.thevarguy.com/2008/05/20/ubuntu-live-2008-conference-canceled/comment-page-1/#comment-115607</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Panettieri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 11:50:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.workswithu.com/2008/05/20/ubuntu-live-2008-conference-canceled/#comment-115607</guid>
		<description>Wayne: Can you clarify your comment. Who has &quot;too much going on this year&quot;? Canonical? The Linux industry? Potential sponsors like Sun? Attendees?

I realize events come and go. Canceling the event isn&#039;t that huge of a deal ... but Canonical failing to announce WHY the event was canceled IS a big deal. Ubuntu is positioned as a growing, thriving platform. By canceling an event without stating why, Canonical may cause fear, uncertainty and doubt among Ubuntu partners.

There may be a perfectly logical, reasonable explanation for canceling the event. But so far, Canonical has been mum. Right now there&#039;s no mention of the cancellation on Canonical&#039;s news site and Canonical&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.canonical.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;own corporate blog&lt;/a&gt; hasn&#039;t been updated since February.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wayne: Can you clarify your comment. Who has &#8220;too much going on this year&#8221;? Canonical? The Linux industry? Potential sponsors like Sun? Attendees?</p>
<p>I realize events come and go. Canceling the event isn&#8217;t that huge of a deal &#8230; but Canonical failing to announce WHY the event was canceled IS a big deal. Ubuntu is positioned as a growing, thriving platform. By canceling an event without stating why, Canonical may cause fear, uncertainty and doubt among Ubuntu partners.</p>
<p>There may be a perfectly logical, reasonable explanation for canceling the event. But so far, Canonical has been mum. Right now there&#8217;s no mention of the cancellation on Canonical&#8217;s news site and Canonical&#8217;s <a href="http://blog.canonical.com/" rel="nofollow">own corporate blog</a> hasn&#8217;t been updated since February.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne</title>
		<link>http://www.thevarguy.com/2008/05/20/ubuntu-live-2008-conference-canceled/comment-page-1/#comment-115606</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 09:05:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.workswithu.com/2008/05/20/ubuntu-live-2008-conference-canceled/#comment-115606</guid>
		<description>I really think there is too much going on this year. The limited funds are probably better spent elsewhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really think there is too much going on this year. The limited funds are probably better spent elsewhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Content Delivery Network via Rackspace Cloud Files: c810354.r54.cf2.rackcdn.com

Served from: www.thevarguy.com @ 2012-02-10 01:13:17 -->
