<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Server&#8217;s Slow: What the Frag Is Wrong?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thevarguy.com/2008/06/12/the-servers-slow-what-the-frag-is-wrong/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thevarguy.com/2008/06/12/the-servers-slow-what-the-frag-is-wrong/</link>
	<description>Channel News, Reseller News and Channel Partner Programs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:00:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DiskeeperDerek</title>
		<link>http://www.thevarguy.com/2008/06/12/the-servers-slow-what-the-frag-is-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-73336</link>
		<dc:creator>DiskeeperDerek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 16:33:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thevarguy.com/2008/06/12/the-servers-slow-what-the-frag-is-wrong/#comment-73336</guid>
		<description>You bet, Doug. Just download the trial ware off the web site. Few realize it, but it&#039;s actually a full version for 30 days. 
So you&#039;ll have a chance to see this new feature in action.

PS. I know the secret identity of the VAR Guy. Or is it really a VAR Gal? Hmmm...The conspiracy theories rage on...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You bet, Doug. Just download the trial ware off the web site. Few realize it, but it&#8217;s actually a full version for 30 days.<br />
So you&#8217;ll have a chance to see this new feature in action.</p>
<p>PS. I know the secret identity of the VAR Guy. Or is it really a VAR Gal? Hmmm&#8230;The conspiracy theories rage on&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dougman</title>
		<link>http://www.thevarguy.com/2008/06/12/the-servers-slow-what-the-frag-is-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-73292</link>
		<dc:creator>Dougman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 22:51:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thevarguy.com/2008/06/12/the-servers-slow-what-the-frag-is-wrong/#comment-73292</guid>
		<description>Derek: Hmmmmm, thanks for the update. I will have to try that some time... :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Derek: Hmmmmm, thanks for the update. I will have to try that some time&#8230; <img src='http://c810354.r54.cf2.rackcdn.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DiskeeperDerek</title>
		<link>http://www.thevarguy.com/2008/06/12/the-servers-slow-what-the-frag-is-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-73263</link>
		<dc:creator>DiskeeperDerek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 19:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thevarguy.com/2008/06/12/the-servers-slow-what-the-frag-is-wrong/#comment-73263</guid>
		<description>Re post #1 above: 

Good news: Diskeeper can now defrag in as low as 1% free space (as of version 2008). So drive space is no longer a problem. This was an enterprise request. But SMB can benefit from the technology in all editions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re post #1 above: </p>
<p>Good news: Diskeeper can now defrag in as low as 1% free space (as of version 2008). So drive space is no longer a problem. This was an enterprise request. But SMB can benefit from the technology in all editions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Balrog</title>
		<link>http://www.thevarguy.com/2008/06/12/the-servers-slow-what-the-frag-is-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-71337</link>
		<dc:creator>Balrog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 17:58:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thevarguy.com/2008/06/12/the-servers-slow-what-the-frag-is-wrong/#comment-71337</guid>
		<description>Auto defragmentation for the servers and workstations is very useful. Unlike the scheduled defrag route of old, it saves on server downtime, manpower and costs. If the machines are able to autonomously &#039;maintain&#039; their own disks to an extent atleast, it ought to preserve system performance (assuming no other problems) and reduce helpdesk calls.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Auto defragmentation for the servers and workstations is very useful. Unlike the scheduled defrag route of old, it saves on server downtime, manpower and costs. If the machines are able to autonomously &#8216;maintain&#8217; their own disks to an extent atleast, it ought to preserve system performance (assuming no other problems) and reduce helpdesk calls.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ppt</title>
		<link>http://www.thevarguy.com/2008/06/12/the-servers-slow-what-the-frag-is-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-71335</link>
		<dc:creator>ppt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 16:56:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thevarguy.com/2008/06/12/the-servers-slow-what-the-frag-is-wrong/#comment-71335</guid>
		<description>We&#039;ve been using Diskeeper on our servers with good results. Never tried JK defrag though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ve been using Diskeeper on our servers with good results. Never tried JK defrag though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DOUGman</title>
		<link>http://www.thevarguy.com/2008/06/12/the-servers-slow-what-the-frag-is-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-71248</link>
		<dc:creator>DOUGman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 01:07:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thevarguy.com/2008/06/12/the-servers-slow-what-the-frag-is-wrong/#comment-71248</guid>
		<description>I can attest to this,  machines/servers that have been running for years with Windows will notoriously get slow over time, unless one schedules and  runs defrag utilities. I can think of ~20 instances where machines were completely in red as opposed to blue, you tell the person to come back in a few hours or you will have it fixed by the next day. To their amazement, it&#039;s like a new machine all over again.

Diskeeper is nice software, as you can set it to defrag at boot. Another one I always use is Jkdefrag, which is free. One thing I tell people, is never fill your drives above 90%, if you do this will effect your defragging utility ability to reorder everything. 

One other thing, linux does need to be defragged as it is very efficient.

D. 

D.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can attest to this,  machines/servers that have been running for years with Windows will notoriously get slow over time, unless one schedules and  runs defrag utilities. I can think of ~20 instances where machines were completely in red as opposed to blue, you tell the person to come back in a few hours or you will have it fixed by the next day. To their amazement, it&#8217;s like a new machine all over again.</p>
<p>Diskeeper is nice software, as you can set it to defrag at boot. Another one I always use is Jkdefrag, which is free. One thing I tell people, is never fill your drives above 90%, if you do this will effect your defragging utility ability to reorder everything. </p>
<p>One other thing, linux does need to be defragged as it is very efficient.</p>
<p>D. </p>
<p>D.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Content Delivery Network via Rackspace Cloud Files: c810354.r54.cf2.rackcdn.com

Served from: www.thevarguy.com @ 2012-02-10 09:06:31 -->
