<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ubuntu 9.04 Arrives, But Where Are the Channel Partners?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thevarguy.com/2009/04/20/ubuntu-904-arrives-but-where-are-the-channel-partners/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thevarguy.com/2009/04/20/ubuntu-904-arrives-but-where-are-the-channel-partners/</link>
	<description>Channel News, Reseller News and Channel Partner Programs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:00:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jef Spaleta</title>
		<link>http://www.thevarguy.com/2009/04/20/ubuntu-904-arrives-but-where-are-the-channel-partners/comment-page-1/#comment-99366</link>
		<dc:creator>Jef Spaleta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 03:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thevarguy.com/2009/04/20/ubuntu-904-arrives-but-where-are-the-channel-partners/#comment-99366</guid>
		<description>You&#039;ll note from shuttleworth&#039;s latest blog entry that 10.4 is not a guaranteed LTS target.
http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/288

&quot;In conversations with Steve McIntyre, the current Debian Project Leader, we’ve identified an interesting opportunity to collaborate. Debian is aiming for an 18 month cycle, which would put their next release around October 2010, which would be the same time as the Ubuntu 10.10 release. Potentially, then, we could defer the Ubuntu LTS till 10.10, coordinating and collaborating with the Debian project for a release with very similar choices of core infrastructure.&quot;

Regardless of the release date of the next LTS...the real question is why wait? Why not start rebuilding a channel solution around the current LTS which still has multiple years of Canonical support ahead of it. At the rate things are going Turnkey linux (which has offerings derived from Ubuntu) is actually going to have a stronger ISV partnership program with its customized application images than Canonical itself before the 10.10 or even the 10.04 release.  

It looks to me like Canonical is placing its near term bets on desktop oriented web services as a revenue generator with its still yet to be unveiled &quot;Ubuntu One&quot; project work. I would expect to see the fruit of that effort up and running as a revenue stream before a significant overhaul of the ISV relationship beyond the existing services listed at http://www.canonical.com/services/packaging

-jef</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ll note from shuttleworth&#8217;s latest blog entry that 10.4 is not a guaranteed LTS target.<br />
<a href="http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/288" rel="nofollow">http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/288</a></p>
<p>&#8220;In conversations with Steve McIntyre, the current Debian Project Leader, we’ve identified an interesting opportunity to collaborate. Debian is aiming for an 18 month cycle, which would put their next release around October 2010, which would be the same time as the Ubuntu 10.10 release. Potentially, then, we could defer the Ubuntu LTS till 10.10, coordinating and collaborating with the Debian project for a release with very similar choices of core infrastructure.&#8221;</p>
<p>Regardless of the release date of the next LTS&#8230;the real question is why wait? Why not start rebuilding a channel solution around the current LTS which still has multiple years of Canonical support ahead of it. At the rate things are going Turnkey linux (which has offerings derived from Ubuntu) is actually going to have a stronger ISV partnership program with its customized application images than Canonical itself before the 10.10 or even the 10.04 release.  </p>
<p>It looks to me like Canonical is placing its near term bets on desktop oriented web services as a revenue generator with its still yet to be unveiled &#8220;Ubuntu One&#8221; project work. I would expect to see the fruit of that effort up and running as a revenue stream before a significant overhaul of the ISV relationship beyond the existing services listed at <a href="http://www.canonical.com/services/packaging" rel="nofollow">http://www.canonical.com/services/packaging</a></p>
<p>-jef</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Panettieri</title>
		<link>http://www.thevarguy.com/2009/04/20/ubuntu-904-arrives-but-where-are-the-channel-partners/comment-page-1/#comment-99365</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Panettieri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 02:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thevarguy.com/2009/04/20/ubuntu-904-arrives-but-where-are-the-channel-partners/#comment-99365</guid>
		<description>Matthews: Great points all around. Let&#039;s hope Canonical has a polished partner program ready to go for the 10.04 Long Term Support launch (April 2010).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matthews: Great points all around. Let&#8217;s hope Canonical has a polished partner program ready to go for the 10.04 Long Term Support launch (April 2010).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthews</title>
		<link>http://www.thevarguy.com/2009/04/20/ubuntu-904-arrives-but-where-are-the-channel-partners/comment-page-1/#comment-99364</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 01:41:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thevarguy.com/2009/04/20/ubuntu-904-arrives-but-where-are-the-channel-partners/#comment-99364</guid>
		<description>@ FreeBooteR

If anyone ISV&#039;s  or Resellers were likely to wait for anything it would by the 10.4 which following Ubuntu&#039;s current path should be the next Long Term Support.
Few ISV&#039;s are likely to want to write applications just to have to modify it to run on the next version in 6 months.
Also in terms of easy for reseller 6 month updates is probably harder to train for and support than LTS.

Ubuntu should already be working on their strategy for 10.4 no one but us crazy Linux enthusiasts want anything to do with the six month releases.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ FreeBooteR</p>
<p>If anyone ISV&#8217;s  or Resellers were likely to wait for anything it would by the 10.4 which following Ubuntu&#8217;s current path should be the next Long Term Support.<br />
Few ISV&#8217;s are likely to want to write applications just to have to modify it to run on the next version in 6 months.<br />
Also in terms of easy for reseller 6 month updates is probably harder to train for and support than LTS.</p>
<p>Ubuntu should already be working on their strategy for 10.4 no one but us crazy Linux enthusiasts want anything to do with the six month releases.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The VAR Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.thevarguy.com/2009/04/20/ubuntu-904-arrives-but-where-are-the-channel-partners/comment-page-1/#comment-99359</link>
		<dc:creator>The VAR Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 00:36:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thevarguy.com/2009/04/20/ubuntu-904-arrives-but-where-are-the-channel-partners/#comment-99359</guid>
		<description>FreeBooteR@3: This isn&#039;t a matter of resellers/VARs waiting for 9.10. It&#039;s more a matter of Canonical developing a compelling partner program that rewards solutions providers ... though The VAR Guy doesn&#039;t want to speak for Joe (the blog author) on this matter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FreeBooteR@3: This isn&#8217;t a matter of resellers/VARs waiting for 9.10. It&#8217;s more a matter of Canonical developing a compelling partner program that rewards solutions providers &#8230; though The VAR Guy doesn&#8217;t want to speak for Joe (the blog author) on this matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The VAR Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.thevarguy.com/2009/04/20/ubuntu-904-arrives-but-where-are-the-channel-partners/comment-page-1/#comment-99358</link>
		<dc:creator>The VAR Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 00:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thevarguy.com/2009/04/20/ubuntu-904-arrives-but-where-are-the-channel-partners/#comment-99358</guid>
		<description>JJ: The VAR Guy is traveling this week but will look into this and get back to you. Either way, he&#039;ll make sure the Google Homepage request gets fulfilled.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JJ: The VAR Guy is traveling this week but will look into this and get back to you. Either way, he&#8217;ll make sure the Google Homepage request gets fulfilled.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JJMacey</title>
		<link>http://www.thevarguy.com/2009/04/20/ubuntu-904-arrives-but-where-are-the-channel-partners/comment-page-1/#comment-99356</link>
		<dc:creator>JJMacey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 00:24:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thevarguy.com/2009/04/20/ubuntu-904-arrives-but-where-are-the-channel-partners/#comment-99356</guid>
		<description>VAR Guy,

Rather than try your RSS I want to add you to my Google Homepage. Do you have a Google Gadget going?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>VAR Guy,</p>
<p>Rather than try your RSS I want to add you to my Google Homepage. Do you have a Google Gadget going?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FreeBooteR</title>
		<link>http://www.thevarguy.com/2009/04/20/ubuntu-904-arrives-but-where-are-the-channel-partners/comment-page-1/#comment-99355</link>
		<dc:creator>FreeBooteR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 00:15:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thevarguy.com/2009/04/20/ubuntu-904-arrives-but-where-are-the-channel-partners/#comment-99355</guid>
		<description>More than likely they will want to wait for a more stable 9.10 version.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More than likely they will want to wait for a more stable 9.10 version.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Panettieri</title>
		<link>http://www.thevarguy.com/2009/04/20/ubuntu-904-arrives-but-where-are-the-channel-partners/comment-page-1/#comment-99347</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Panettieri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 20:07:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thevarguy.com/2009/04/20/ubuntu-904-arrives-but-where-are-the-channel-partners/#comment-99347</guid>
		<description>UbuntuVAR: When you&#039;re ready to brag about some customer wins let us know. We&#039;d like to learn more. And you raise some good points. Canonical has developed OEM relationships that other companies envy. 

Surely those OEMs count as channel partners. And over time, those OEMs could help Canonical line up more VARs and integrators. 

But I was surprised when Shuttleworth had nothing to really share about how Ubuntu 9.04 could potentially gain traction in the channel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UbuntuVAR: When you&#8217;re ready to brag about some customer wins let us know. We&#8217;d like to learn more. And you raise some good points. Canonical has developed OEM relationships that other companies envy. </p>
<p>Surely those OEMs count as channel partners. And over time, those OEMs could help Canonical line up more VARs and integrators. </p>
<p>But I was surprised when Shuttleworth had nothing to really share about how Ubuntu 9.04 could potentially gain traction in the channel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UbuntuVAR</title>
		<link>http://www.thevarguy.com/2009/04/20/ubuntu-904-arrives-but-where-are-the-channel-partners/comment-page-1/#comment-99346</link>
		<dc:creator>UbuntuVAR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 19:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thevarguy.com/2009/04/20/ubuntu-904-arrives-but-where-are-the-channel-partners/#comment-99346</guid>
		<description>Yes, I support Ubuntu deployments. You are correct to point out that there aren&#039;t many of us out here. But it seems to me Canonical&#039;s step one partner strategy involves mostly OEMs. Those hardware suppliers have their own VAR and partners networks that can take Ubuntu to market. Don&#039;t underestimate the Ubuntu OEMs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I support Ubuntu deployments. You are correct to point out that there aren&#8217;t many of us out here. But it seems to me Canonical&#8217;s step one partner strategy involves mostly OEMs. Those hardware suppliers have their own VAR and partners networks that can take Ubuntu to market. Don&#8217;t underestimate the Ubuntu OEMs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Content Delivery Network via Rackspace Cloud Files: c810354.r54.cf2.rackcdn.com

Served from: www.thevarguy.com @ 2012-02-10 11:09:06 -->
