<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Open Source Investment: Citrix Attacks Cisco Systems</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thevarguy.com/2009/06/09/open-source-investment-citrix-attacking-cisco-systems/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thevarguy.com/2009/06/09/open-source-investment-citrix-attacking-cisco-systems/</link>
	<description>What's Next In the IT Channel</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 18:07:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The VAR Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.thevarguy.com/2009/06/09/open-source-investment-citrix-attacking-cisco-systems/comment-page-1/#comment-105629</link>
		<dc:creator>The VAR Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 19:46:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thevarguy.com/?p=3142#comment-105629</guid>
		<description>Jorge: Thanks for the tip. Does that mean your company ultimately went with the Positron/Asterisk solution? If so how is it working out?
-TVG</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jorge: Thanks for the tip. Does that mean your company ultimately went with the Positron/Asterisk solution? If so how is it working out?<br />
-TVG</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jorge Figueroa</title>
		<link>http://www.thevarguy.com/2009/06/09/open-source-investment-citrix-attacking-cisco-systems/comment-page-1/#comment-105628</link>
		<dc:creator>Jorge Figueroa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 19:34:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thevarguy.com/?p=3142#comment-105628</guid>
		<description>I just started looking into Vyatta and like &quot;BD&quot; my company needs the VOIP gateway + FXS functionality. I work for a clothing retail company and at each store we only have need for 2 analog phones and 1 fax. During my search I just found a company called Positron that makes a &quot;PBX PCI Adapter&quot; that contains Asterisk. See the information here:

http://www.tmcnet.com/channels/pbx-pci-adapter/articles/66507-positrons-voip-enabled-pbx-systems-compatible-with-vyattas.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just started looking into Vyatta and like &#8220;BD&#8221; my company needs the VOIP gateway + FXS functionality. I work for a clothing retail company and at each store we only have need for 2 analog phones and 1 fax. During my search I just found a company called Positron that makes a &#8220;PBX PCI Adapter&#8221; that contains Asterisk. See the information here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.tmcnet.com/channels/pbx-pci-adapter/articles/66507-positrons-voip-enabled-pbx-systems-compatible-with-vyattas.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.tmcnet.com/channels/pbx-pci-adapter/articles/66507-positrons-voip-enabled-pbx-systems-compatible-with-vyattas.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Roberts</title>
		<link>http://www.thevarguy.com/2009/06/09/open-source-investment-citrix-attacking-cisco-systems/comment-page-1/#comment-102994</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Roberts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 22:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thevarguy.com/?p=3142#comment-102994</guid>
		<description>There are a couple of different options for voice support on Vyatta today. First, since Vyatta is package-compatible with Debian, you could simply install something like Asterisk on top of Vyatta. It would not be integrated, but it would run. If you do this, you would also be able to use compatible FXO/FXS/etc. cards with some driver work to recompile things against the Vyatta kernel. If you&#039;re just interested in VoIP, you could also use virtualization (Xen, VMware, whatever), and run Vyatta and your voice app (Asterisk, Freeswitch, whatever) in separate VMs. The downside here is that you lose access to the hardware (though even that is somewhat possible with something like PCI pass-through with Xen). Finally, as Patrick says, you can use different blades in the same chassis or simply different 1U servers. Yes, that&#039;s completely non-integrated, but that may not really matter much if the price is right. The nice thing about Vyatta is that the choice is yours. Over time, expect to see more integration and better out-of-the-box voice support from Vyatta.

Disclaimer: I&#039;m the VP of strategy and marketing for Vyatta.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are a couple of different options for voice support on Vyatta today. First, since Vyatta is package-compatible with Debian, you could simply install something like Asterisk on top of Vyatta. It would not be integrated, but it would run. If you do this, you would also be able to use compatible FXO/FXS/etc. cards with some driver work to recompile things against the Vyatta kernel. If you&#8217;re just interested in VoIP, you could also use virtualization (Xen, VMware, whatever), and run Vyatta and your voice app (Asterisk, Freeswitch, whatever) in separate VMs. The downside here is that you lose access to the hardware (though even that is somewhat possible with something like PCI pass-through with Xen). Finally, as Patrick says, you can use different blades in the same chassis or simply different 1U servers. Yes, that&#8217;s completely non-integrated, but that may not really matter much if the price is right. The nice thing about Vyatta is that the choice is yours. Over time, expect to see more integration and better out-of-the-box voice support from Vyatta.</p>
<p>Disclaimer: I&#8217;m the VP of strategy and marketing for Vyatta.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.thevarguy.com/2009/06/09/open-source-investment-citrix-attacking-cisco-systems/comment-page-1/#comment-102960</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 19:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thevarguy.com/?p=3142#comment-102960</guid>
		<description>@BD: PRI, FXO &amp; FXS cards are not VoIP but legacy PSTN interfaces. You are probably looking for a VoIP  PSTN gateway device (something like the Cisco 26xx concept). I would be surprised if Vyatta offered that since they are not in the VoIP  PSTN gateway business which is an entirely different and pretty complex ballgame. The bugs I have seen in Cisco&#039;s SIP firmware are a testament to that :-) Cisco obviously has the cash to develop or buy VoIP/PSTN technology and integrate it into their kit. But the fact that Vyatta by itself doesn&#039;t meet your requirements doesn&#039;t mean that it can&#039;t be part of a solution that could. You can get a blade server and run Vyatta on a couple. And then run a VoIP  PSTN gateway like Freeswitch (www.freeswitch.org) on another set. Different approach but very powerful, flexible and it doesn&#039;t come with the Cisco price tag. But this requires one to think outside of the box and deviate from the Cisco &quot;integrated solution&quot; party line. Well worth it if you ask me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@BD: PRI, FXO &amp; FXS cards are not VoIP but legacy PSTN interfaces. You are probably looking for a VoIP  PSTN gateway device (something like the Cisco 26xx concept). I would be surprised if Vyatta offered that since they are not in the VoIP  PSTN gateway business which is an entirely different and pretty complex ballgame. The bugs I have seen in Cisco&#8217;s SIP firmware are a testament to that <img src='http://www.thevarguy.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  Cisco obviously has the cash to develop or buy VoIP/PSTN technology and integrate it into their kit. But the fact that Vyatta by itself doesn&#8217;t meet your requirements doesn&#8217;t mean that it can&#8217;t be part of a solution that could. You can get a blade server and run Vyatta on a couple. And then run a VoIP  PSTN gateway like Freeswitch (www.freeswitch.org) on another set. Different approach but very powerful, flexible and it doesn&#8217;t come with the Cisco price tag. But this requires one to think outside of the box and deviate from the Cisco &#8220;integrated solution&#8221; party line. Well worth it if you ask me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The VAR Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.thevarguy.com/2009/06/09/open-source-investment-citrix-attacking-cisco-systems/comment-page-1/#comment-102898</link>
		<dc:creator>The VAR Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 13:29:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thevarguy.com/?p=3142#comment-102898</guid>
		<description>BD: The VAR Guy intends to speak with Vyatta later this week and will raise the issues you shared here. Thanks for the perspective.
-TVG</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BD: The VAR Guy intends to speak with Vyatta later this week and will raise the issues you shared here. Thanks for the perspective.<br />
-TVG</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BD</title>
		<link>http://www.thevarguy.com/2009/06/09/open-source-investment-citrix-attacking-cisco-systems/comment-page-1/#comment-102895</link>
		<dc:creator>BD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 11:47:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thevarguy.com/?p=3142#comment-102895</guid>
		<description>FWIW....We took a hard look at a possible large scale Cisco replacement with Vyatta.  The project never got off the ground after Vyatta reps informed us that there is no support for VOIP devices in the routers such as PRIs, FXO and FXS cards.  Vyatta seeme to be just a router platform with no VOIP support ie, interfaces, gateway protocol support.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FWIW&#8230;.We took a hard look at a possible large scale Cisco replacement with Vyatta.  The project never got off the ground after Vyatta reps informed us that there is no support for VOIP devices in the routers such as PRIs, FXO and FXS cards.  Vyatta seeme to be just a router platform with no VOIP support ie, interfaces, gateway protocol support.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The VAR Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.thevarguy.com/2009/06/09/open-source-investment-citrix-attacking-cisco-systems/comment-page-1/#comment-102883</link>
		<dc:creator>The VAR Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 20:45:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thevarguy.com/?p=3142#comment-102883</guid>
		<description>Frankie: Let us know if you do any deals involving Citrix-Vyatta. The VAR Guy would like to hear more.
-TVG</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frankie: Let us know if you do any deals involving Citrix-Vyatta. The VAR Guy would like to hear more.<br />
-TVG</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frankie Says</title>
		<link>http://www.thevarguy.com/2009/06/09/open-source-investment-citrix-attacking-cisco-systems/comment-page-1/#comment-102876</link>
		<dc:creator>Frankie Says</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 20:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thevarguy.com/?p=3142#comment-102876</guid>
		<description>Hey Var Guy we&#039;ve been watching Vyatta and seen it go into four of our customer networks since January. We weren&#039;t involved in the Vyatta sales but it might be time to give them a call. We&#039;re a Citrix partner that also does some procurve work so you can see where I&#039;m going with this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Var Guy we&#8217;ve been watching Vyatta and seen it go into four of our customer networks since January. We weren&#8217;t involved in the Vyatta sales but it might be time to give them a call. We&#8217;re a Citrix partner that also does some procurve work so you can see where I&#8217;m going with this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
