<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ubuntu 10.04: A Closer Look</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thevarguy.com/2009/09/22/ubuntu-1004-a-closer-look/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thevarguy.com/2009/09/22/ubuntu-1004-a-closer-look/</link>
	<description>Channel News, Reseller News and Channel Partner Programs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:59:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ubuntu Lucid Lynx 10.04LTS &#8211; Landmark release? &#171; OPEN BYTES &#8211; cave quid dicis, quando, et cui.</title>
		<link>http://www.thevarguy.com/2009/09/22/ubuntu-1004-a-closer-look/comment-page-1/#comment-119177</link>
		<dc:creator>Ubuntu Lucid Lynx 10.04LTS &#8211; Landmark release? &#171; OPEN BYTES &#8211; cave quid dicis, quando, et cui.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 08:48:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.workswithu.com/?p=1186#comment-119177</guid>
		<description>[...] http://www.workswithu.com/2009/09/22/ubuntu-1004-a-closer-look/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.workswithu.com/2009/09/22/ubuntu-1004-a-closer-look/" rel="nofollow">http://www.workswithu.com/2009/09/22/ubuntu-1004-a-closer-look/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.thevarguy.com/2009/09/22/ubuntu-1004-a-closer-look/comment-page-1/#comment-119176</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 00:23:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.workswithu.com/?p=1186#comment-119176</guid>
		<description>On quality of release cycles...  I think this is why Canonical uses LTS releases.  The releases in between can be used to test new features and implement new code without hurting those who desire the stability of LTS.

I don&#039;t think anyone can argue that Canonical has not contributed as much to the Linux Kernel but as previously stated, sometimes its not just about the code.  Creating ease of use and nice packaging goes a long way with end users.  Creating lots of services that actually work is fantastic as well.

Lastly...Gnome Shell.  Oh, how I am mixed on it.  If it works better than KDE 4 on release I&#039;ll be surprised.  KDE 4.3 still crashes on me and is a slug relative to Gnome 2.  I know that Gnome is feeling a bit dated but it works.  However, I&#039;m one of those bleeding edge folks that likes wiz bang newness.  So I&#039;m willing to give Shell a shot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On quality of release cycles&#8230;  I think this is why Canonical uses LTS releases.  The releases in between can be used to test new features and implement new code without hurting those who desire the stability of LTS.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think anyone can argue that Canonical has not contributed as much to the Linux Kernel but as previously stated, sometimes its not just about the code.  Creating ease of use and nice packaging goes a long way with end users.  Creating lots of services that actually work is fantastic as well.</p>
<p>Lastly&#8230;Gnome Shell.  Oh, how I am mixed on it.  If it works better than KDE 4 on release I&#8217;ll be surprised.  KDE 4.3 still crashes on me and is a slug relative to Gnome 2.  I know that Gnome is feeling a bit dated but it works.  However, I&#8217;m one of those bleeding edge folks that likes wiz bang newness.  So I&#8217;m willing to give Shell a shot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zac</title>
		<link>http://www.thevarguy.com/2009/09/22/ubuntu-1004-a-closer-look/comment-page-1/#comment-119175</link>
		<dc:creator>Zac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 15:25:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.workswithu.com/?p=1186#comment-119175</guid>
		<description>I hope that Canonical can have a descent and reliable revenue stream. I would love to see Linux people in a paying job, and I hope Canonical can help with that. The more money they get the more they can offer full time work, and then Linux with improve.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope that Canonical can have a descent and reliable revenue stream. I would love to see Linux people in a paying job, and I hope Canonical can help with that. The more money they get the more they can offer full time work, and then Linux with improve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leonel Nunez (len) 's status on Monday, 05-Oct-09 18:22:55 UTC - Identi.ca</title>
		<link>http://www.thevarguy.com/2009/09/22/ubuntu-1004-a-closer-look/comment-page-1/#comment-119174</link>
		<dc:creator>Leonel Nunez (len) 's status on Monday, 05-Oct-09 18:22:55 UTC - Identi.ca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 18:23:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.workswithu.com/?p=1186#comment-119174</guid>
		<description>[...]  http://www.workswithu.com/2009/09/22/ubuntu-1004-a-closer-look/        a few seconds ago  from  Gwibber   in context [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  <a href="http://www.workswithu.com/2009/09/22/ubuntu-1004-a-closer-look/" rel="nofollow">http://www.workswithu.com/2009/09/22/ubuntu-1004-a-closer-look/</a>        a few seconds ago  from  Gwibber   in context [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nillbug</title>
		<link>http://www.thevarguy.com/2009/09/22/ubuntu-1004-a-closer-look/comment-page-1/#comment-119173</link>
		<dc:creator>Nillbug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 17:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.workswithu.com/?p=1186#comment-119173</guid>
		<description>&quot;.... I think Ubuntu has done an excellent job of looking at the system as a whole instead of just a coding project....&quot;

This is very true. In fact they&#039;re looking both at the system and at the end user as a whole, and by investing a lot in marketing they brought widespread attention to Linux in general.


&quot;......Critics contend that Ubuntu’s regular release cycle compromises quality, since it forces software to be pushed out the door before it’s been adequately tested.&quot;.......

I think maybe Canonical could experiment a joint venture with another distribution that would work as a kind of her testing branch. We know that lots of users like to stay always at the bleeding edge of technology even if compromising some stability. So, this related distribution would work like Canonical&#039;s Suse vs Novell or Fedora vs Red Hat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;. I think Ubuntu has done an excellent job of looking at the system as a whole instead of just a coding project&#8230;.&#8221;</p>
<p>This is very true. In fact they&#8217;re looking both at the system and at the end user as a whole, and by investing a lot in marketing they brought widespread attention to Linux in general.</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;&#8230;Critics contend that Ubuntu’s regular release cycle compromises quality, since it forces software to be pushed out the door before it’s been adequately tested.&#8221;&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
<p>I think maybe Canonical could experiment a joint venture with another distribution that would work as a kind of her testing branch. We know that lots of users like to stay always at the bleeding edge of technology even if compromising some stability. So, this related distribution would work like Canonical&#8217;s Suse vs Novell or Fedora vs Red Hat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: McIvor</title>
		<link>http://www.thevarguy.com/2009/09/22/ubuntu-1004-a-closer-look/comment-page-1/#comment-119172</link>
		<dc:creator>McIvor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 15:18:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.workswithu.com/?p=1186#comment-119172</guid>
		<description>@ Anonymous, September 22nd, 2009 at 8:47 pm:

Maybe Ubuntu doesn&#039;t contribute as much to the code base of upstream projects as the other distributions do. But that&#039;s all right, because there&#039;s more to an operating system than coding. If writing good code was all that mattered, Windows would be no more than a distant memory. Ubuntu really shines in the areas of interface and usability. You&#039;ll never get people to switch to a Linux-based system if you give them a fresh Gentoo install and tell them to go wild. (Ok, maybe some people will, but not enough to mention.)
Canonical is also responsible for Launchpad, Landscape, and Bazaar, which are very important in their own right, although not necessarily a part of the operating system. I think Ubuntu has done an excellent job of looking at the system as a whole instead of just a coding project.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Anonymous, September 22nd, 2009 at 8:47 pm:</p>
<p>Maybe Ubuntu doesn&#8217;t contribute as much to the code base of upstream projects as the other distributions do. But that&#8217;s all right, because there&#8217;s more to an operating system than coding. If writing good code was all that mattered, Windows would be no more than a distant memory. Ubuntu really shines in the areas of interface and usability. You&#8217;ll never get people to switch to a Linux-based system if you give them a fresh Gentoo install and tell them to go wild. (Ok, maybe some people will, but not enough to mention.)<br />
Canonical is also responsible for Launchpad, Landscape, and Bazaar, which are very important in their own right, although not necessarily a part of the operating system. I think Ubuntu has done an excellent job of looking at the system as a whole instead of just a coding project.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy (linuxcanuck) 's status on Thursday, 24-Sep-09 18:49:07 UTC - Identi.ca</title>
		<link>http://www.thevarguy.com/2009/09/22/ubuntu-1004-a-closer-look/comment-page-1/#comment-119171</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy (linuxcanuck) 's status on Thursday, 24-Sep-09 18:49:07 UTC - Identi.ca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 18:49:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.workswithu.com/?p=1186#comment-119171</guid>
		<description>[...] Ubuntu 10.04 is Lucid Lynx http://www.workswithu.com/2009/09/22/ubuntu-1004-a-closer-look/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ubuntu 10.04 is Lucid Lynx <a href="http://www.workswithu.com/2009/09/22/ubuntu-1004-a-closer-look/" rel="nofollow">http://www.workswithu.com/2009/09/22/ubuntu-1004-a-closer-look/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aikiwolfie</title>
		<link>http://www.thevarguy.com/2009/09/22/ubuntu-1004-a-closer-look/comment-page-1/#comment-119170</link>
		<dc:creator>aikiwolfie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 16:13:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.workswithu.com/?p=1186#comment-119170</guid>
		<description>The Clutter desktop that comes with Moblin looks really good. I&#039;d like to see that as an option for the desktop. Even if it&#039;s just sitting in the repositories. I tried to build it my self but some thing&#039;s missing from my system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Clutter desktop that comes with Moblin looks really good. I&#8217;d like to see that as an option for the desktop. Even if it&#8217;s just sitting in the repositories. I tried to build it my self but some thing&#8217;s missing from my system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian</title>
		<link>http://www.thevarguy.com/2009/09/22/ubuntu-1004-a-closer-look/comment-page-1/#comment-119169</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 13:14:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.workswithu.com/?p=1186#comment-119169</guid>
		<description>But anything is better than Windows. Ubuntu has provided me a solution to escape the issues of running a Microsoft OS in a closed environment.

It&#039;s great times for Linux. Its slowly being recognized as a viable alternative to using Windows. We should all get together and support and make Linux great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But anything is better than Windows. Ubuntu has provided me a solution to escape the issues of running a Microsoft OS in a closed environment.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s great times for Linux. Its slowly being recognized as a viable alternative to using Windows. We should all get together and support and make Linux great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: r4 sdhc</title>
		<link>http://www.thevarguy.com/2009/09/22/ubuntu-1004-a-closer-look/comment-page-1/#comment-119168</link>
		<dc:creator>r4 sdhc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 09:53:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.workswithu.com/?p=1186#comment-119168</guid>
		<description>I watch this video about Ubuntu and read the all contains it&#039;s really cool. Ubuntu is my favorite operating system..
Thank you for share the video...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I watch this video about Ubuntu and read the all contains it&#8217;s really cool. Ubuntu is my favorite operating system..<br />
Thank you for share the video&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.thevarguy.com/2009/09/22/ubuntu-1004-a-closer-look/comment-page-1/#comment-119167</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 03:47:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.workswithu.com/?p=1186#comment-119167</guid>
		<description>Canonical is mostly a leech and not leading the development of anything. Let&#039;s be clear about this: Ubuntu relies on the development of Debian and does not develop much at all. It&#039;s not in the same league as Debian, Red Hat/Fedora, Novell, or even little old Mandriva. They are major developers in Linux. They contribute a lot to many projects around the FOSS community. Ubuntu mostly markets itself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Canonical is mostly a leech and not leading the development of anything. Let&#8217;s be clear about this: Ubuntu relies on the development of Debian and does not develop much at all. It&#8217;s not in the same league as Debian, Red Hat/Fedora, Novell, or even little old Mandriva. They are major developers in Linux. They contribute a lot to many projects around the FOSS community. Ubuntu mostly markets itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dario</title>
		<link>http://www.thevarguy.com/2009/09/22/ubuntu-1004-a-closer-look/comment-page-1/#comment-119166</link>
		<dc:creator>Dario</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 02:06:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.workswithu.com/?p=1186#comment-119166</guid>
		<description>what about the 10 seconds goal they promised?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what about the 10 seconds goal they promised?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Content Delivery Network via Rackspace Cloud Files: c810354.r54.cf2.rackcdn.com

Served from: www.thevarguy.com @ 2012-02-09 23:05:14 -->
