<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lubuntu: Not Just for Lusers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thevarguy.com/2010/02/16/lubuntu-not-just-for-lusers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thevarguy.com/2010/02/16/lubuntu-not-just-for-lusers/</link>
	<description>Channel News, Reseller News and Channel Partner Programs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:59:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zachary Haynes</title>
		<link>http://www.thevarguy.com/2010/02/16/lubuntu-not-just-for-lusers/comment-page-1/#comment-122208</link>
		<dc:creator>Zachary Haynes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 03:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.workswithu.com/?p=1830#comment-122208</guid>
		<description>I have some old laptops that xubuntu has worked &quot;ok&quot; on, but I always revert back to xp because the ease of setup outweighs the VERY SMALL increase in speed.  I recently installed ubuntu on my new laptop via virtualbox because ktechlab lets me save and/or diagrams to graphics for school.  I noticed that Lubuntu is actually shown in symantic, so I thought i would give it a whirl.

I know I have gnome installed too, but adding Lubuntu to an existing gnome install is still EXTREMELY FAST, even working in virtualbox.  I am very impressed, and I may decide to revisit this on some of my older hardware.

I may be mistaken, but even by installing this way, you get the speed because of the low ram use of lxde, and the reliability of the extra gnome packages.  I think it&#039;s a win/win!

And to the guy that was unimpressed with all the hype of lxde... For the sucky win users like myself that can&#039;t configure our way out of a paper bag... Lxde is simple, has a win feel, runs fast on pos hardware AND having all of the Ubuntu repository entries available doesn&#039;t hurt either</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have some old laptops that xubuntu has worked &#8220;ok&#8221; on, but I always revert back to xp because the ease of setup outweighs the VERY SMALL increase in speed.  I recently installed ubuntu on my new laptop via virtualbox because ktechlab lets me save and/or diagrams to graphics for school.  I noticed that Lubuntu is actually shown in symantic, so I thought i would give it a whirl.</p>
<p>I know I have gnome installed too, but adding Lubuntu to an existing gnome install is still EXTREMELY FAST, even working in virtualbox.  I am very impressed, and I may decide to revisit this on some of my older hardware.</p>
<p>I may be mistaken, but even by installing this way, you get the speed because of the low ram use of lxde, and the reliability of the extra gnome packages.  I think it&#8217;s a win/win!</p>
<p>And to the guy that was unimpressed with all the hype of lxde&#8230; For the sucky win users like myself that can&#8217;t configure our way out of a paper bag&#8230; Lxde is simple, has a win feel, runs fast on pos hardware AND having all of the Ubuntu repository entries available doesn&#8217;t hurt either</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barista Uno</title>
		<link>http://www.thevarguy.com/2010/02/16/lubuntu-not-just-for-lusers/comment-page-1/#comment-120483</link>
		<dc:creator>Barista Uno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Sep 2010 13:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.workswithu.com/?p=1830#comment-120483</guid>
		<description>Some folks may be turned off by the sheer leanness of Lubuntu 10.04, what with the meagre collection of installed apps. I myself had to install a number of my favourite apps including openoffice, wine, VLC nd xpad but it didn&#039;t take a Herculean effort to do so. The bottom-line is that Lubuntu is fast, stable and based on the LTS Ubuntu edition. IMHO, it is much better than Peppermint OS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some folks may be turned off by the sheer leanness of Lubuntu 10.04, what with the meagre collection of installed apps. I myself had to install a number of my favourite apps including openoffice, wine, VLC nd xpad but it didn&#8217;t take a Herculean effort to do so. The bottom-line is that Lubuntu is fast, stable and based on the LTS Ubuntu edition. IMHO, it is much better than Peppermint OS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leon</title>
		<link>http://www.thevarguy.com/2010/02/16/lubuntu-not-just-for-lusers/comment-page-1/#comment-120482</link>
		<dc:creator>Leon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 18:41:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.workswithu.com/?p=1830#comment-120482</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a satisfied Xubuntu user (I&#039;ve been using it for right about a year now), but I&#039;ve had my eye on Lubuntu for a little while.  Once it goes official distro I&#039;ll definitely have to check it out--but in any case, Lubuntu will have to work better for me than Xubuntu before I&#039;ll consider switching.  Lightweight apps are a good and wonderful thing, but if they don&#039;t provide me the functionality I&#039;m used to getting from the XFCE flavor, Lubuntu won&#039;t quite cut it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a satisfied Xubuntu user (I&#8217;ve been using it for right about a year now), but I&#8217;ve had my eye on Lubuntu for a little while.  Once it goes official distro I&#8217;ll definitely have to check it out&#8211;but in any case, Lubuntu will have to work better for me than Xubuntu before I&#8217;ll consider switching.  Lightweight apps are a good and wonderful thing, but if they don&#8217;t provide me the functionality I&#8217;m used to getting from the XFCE flavor, Lubuntu won&#8217;t quite cut it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rodnox</title>
		<link>http://www.thevarguy.com/2010/02/16/lubuntu-not-just-for-lusers/comment-page-1/#comment-120481</link>
		<dc:creator>Rodnox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 00:39:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.workswithu.com/?p=1830#comment-120481</guid>
		<description>Aehm .... Canonical officially calles 4 OS their own.
Ubuntu, Kubuntu, Xubuntu and Ubuntu-Studio.

So now it&#039;s 5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aehm &#8230;. Canonical officially calles 4 OS their own.<br />
Ubuntu, Kubuntu, Xubuntu and Ubuntu-Studio.</p>
<p>So now it&#8217;s 5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ubuntu Weekly Newsletter #181 &#124; 48da Tech News</title>
		<link>http://www.thevarguy.com/2010/02/16/lubuntu-not-just-for-lusers/comment-page-1/#comment-120480</link>
		<dc:creator>Ubuntu Weekly Newsletter #181 &#124; 48da Tech News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 09:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.workswithu.com/?p=1830#comment-120480</guid>
		<description>[...] http://www.workswithu.com/2010/02/16/lubuntu-not-just-for-lusers/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.workswithu.com/2010/02/16/lubuntu-not-just-for-lusers/" rel="nofollow">http://www.workswithu.com/2010/02/16/lubuntu-not-just-for-lusers/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Artemis3</title>
		<link>http://www.thevarguy.com/2010/02/16/lubuntu-not-just-for-lusers/comment-page-1/#comment-120479</link>
		<dc:creator>Artemis3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 09:38:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.workswithu.com/?p=1830#comment-120479</guid>
		<description>Xubuntu is not lightweight not because of XFCE but because of the myriad of gnome apps in comes with, which end loading gnome libs eating your memory in the end.

I hope Lubuntu avoids falling this trap again.

As for light apps there is stuff like Midori for Browsing, Gnumeric for spreadsheets, SLIM for logging in, etc.

I&#039;m also interested in the e17 usage for Ubuntu Netbook Remix.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Xubuntu is not lightweight not because of XFCE but because of the myriad of gnome apps in comes with, which end loading gnome libs eating your memory in the end.</p>
<p>I hope Lubuntu avoids falling this trap again.</p>
<p>As for light apps there is stuff like Midori for Browsing, Gnumeric for spreadsheets, SLIM for logging in, etc.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m also interested in the e17 usage for Ubuntu Netbook Remix.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leo</title>
		<link>http://www.thevarguy.com/2010/02/16/lubuntu-not-just-for-lusers/comment-page-1/#comment-120478</link>
		<dc:creator>Leo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 12:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.workswithu.com/?p=1830#comment-120478</guid>
		<description>I think we should also mention Enlightenment

It will now provide the Ubuntu interface for ARM:
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&amp;px=Nzk5Mw

It has also been recently funded by Samsung, because it scales well all the way down to a smartphone. I think it is more mature than lxde and very functional. Among other things they have a built in profiler so they can check for regressions in performance every time they modify their code. Neat!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we should also mention Enlightenment</p>
<p>It will now provide the Ubuntu interface for ARM:<br />
<a href="http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&#038;px=Nzk5Mw" rel="nofollow">http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&#038;px=Nzk5Mw</a></p>
<p>It has also been recently funded by Samsung, because it scales well all the way down to a smartphone. I think it is more mature than lxde and very functional. Among other things they have a built in profiler so they can check for regressions in performance every time they modify their code. Neat!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leo</title>
		<link>http://www.thevarguy.com/2010/02/16/lubuntu-not-just-for-lusers/comment-page-1/#comment-120477</link>
		<dc:creator>Leo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 10:56:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.workswithu.com/?p=1830#comment-120477</guid>
		<description>I just tried in Lucid, it does look nicer! There is also a lubuntu-netbook login session, with a different theme (not sure if there other differences, maybe so)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just tried in Lucid, it does look nicer! There is also a lubuntu-netbook login session, with a different theme (not sure if there other differences, maybe so)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leo</title>
		<link>http://www.thevarguy.com/2010/02/16/lubuntu-not-just-for-lusers/comment-page-1/#comment-120476</link>
		<dc:creator>Leo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 19:35:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.workswithu.com/?p=1830#comment-120476</guid>
		<description>@Rafael: excellent, do I just need to upgrade my Lucid to rejoice, then? I have lubuntu-desktop installed

Thanks for the good news :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Rafael: excellent, do I just need to upgrade my Lucid to rejoice, then? I have lubuntu-desktop installed</p>
<p>Thanks for the good news <img src='http://c810354.r54.cf2.rackcdn.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: snkiz</title>
		<link>http://www.thevarguy.com/2010/02/16/lubuntu-not-just-for-lusers/comment-page-1/#comment-120475</link>
		<dc:creator>snkiz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 16:12:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.workswithu.com/?p=1830#comment-120475</guid>
		<description>I tried lxde when it first popped up, but stopped using it due to a bug in recognizing file types  in pcmanfm. (That is still there a year latter in 9.10! But not in source snapshots any more thankfully.) Over all lxde is quite capable, and it can be made to look better. However the slow movement on something as critical as the filemanager is worrisome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried lxde when it first popped up, but stopped using it due to a bug in recognizing file types  in pcmanfm. (That is still there a year latter in 9.10! But not in source snapshots any more thankfully.) Over all lxde is quite capable, and it can be made to look better. However the slow movement on something as critical as the filemanager is worrisome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rafael Laguna</title>
		<link>http://www.thevarguy.com/2010/02/16/lubuntu-not-just-for-lusers/comment-page-1/#comment-120474</link>
		<dc:creator>Rafael Laguna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 13:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.workswithu.com/?p=1830#comment-120474</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t care , you&#039;ll get a nice surprise in artwork on the next Alpha (I know because I&#039;m a Lubuntu team member).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t care , you&#8217;ll get a nice surprise in artwork on the next Alpha (I know because I&#8217;m a Lubuntu team member).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Links 17/2/2010: Calculate Linux 10.2 Released, SimplyMEPIS 8.5 @ Beta 5 &#124; Boycott Novell</title>
		<link>http://www.thevarguy.com/2010/02/16/lubuntu-not-just-for-lusers/comment-page-1/#comment-120473</link>
		<dc:creator>Links 17/2/2010: Calculate Linux 10.2 Released, SimplyMEPIS 8.5 @ Beta 5 &#124; Boycott Novell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 22:30:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.workswithu.com/?p=1830#comment-120473</guid>
		<description>[...] Lubuntu: Not Just for Lusers For a long time, the Ubuntu family has had three members–Ubuntu, Kubuntu and Xubuntu (sorry Edubuntu; we’re not counting you). But that may change, with a new project, Lubuntu, vying for official endorsement by Canonical. Here’s a look at Lubuntu, and thoughts on what its future may hold. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Lubuntu: Not Just for Lusers For a long time, the Ubuntu family has had three members–Ubuntu, Kubuntu and Xubuntu (sorry Edubuntu; we’re not counting you). But that may change, with a new project, Lubuntu, vying for official endorsement by Canonical. Here’s a look at Lubuntu, and thoughts on what its future may hold. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Content Delivery Network via Rackspace Cloud Files: c810354.r54.cf2.rackcdn.com

Served from: www.thevarguy.com @ 2012-02-09 23:10:18 -->
