<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mac Server Virtualization: Hot or Not?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thevarguy.com/2010/06/23/mac-server-virtualization-hot-or-not/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thevarguy.com/2010/06/23/mac-server-virtualization-hot-or-not/</link>
	<description>Channel News, Reseller News and Channel Partner Programs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:00:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Devon</title>
		<link>http://www.thevarguy.com/2010/06/23/mac-server-virtualization-hot-or-not/comment-page-1/#comment-111583</link>
		<dc:creator>Devon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 15:32:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thevarguy.com/?p=12355#comment-111583</guid>
		<description>Mac virtualization would be hot if it was built in to OS-X. It is the only platform that does not offer some form of integrated virtualization. I really think that a 2,000 price tag is also ridiculous. 

This is not VMWARE, and personally Parallels really could have offered the virtualization platform for a cheaper price based on the fact that the actual hypervisor itself is derived from their desktop platform which sells for around $80.00.

500.00 maybe 2000.00 not a chance. 

Mac virtualization will not be a trend until it is built in like Hyper-v or KVM.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mac virtualization would be hot if it was built in to OS-X. It is the only platform that does not offer some form of integrated virtualization. I really think that a 2,000 price tag is also ridiculous. </p>
<p>This is not VMWARE, and personally Parallels really could have offered the virtualization platform for a cheaper price based on the fact that the actual hypervisor itself is derived from their desktop platform which sells for around $80.00.</p>
<p>500.00 maybe 2000.00 not a chance. </p>
<p>Mac virtualization will not be a trend until it is built in like Hyper-v or KVM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Content Delivery Network via Rackspace Cloud Files: c810354.r54.cf2.rackcdn.com

Served from: www.thevarguy.com @ 2012-02-10 10:12:43 -->
